Very clear and the layout is accessible to the layperson trying to understand the Kafkaesque underworld of family law in Canada in the 21st century. Bravo 👌
I've only been married once. It meant she was in denial and didnt want her own accountability checked. If there was a difference of opinion it would be expressed with the possibility of one party changing their mind given evidence and argument. Using 'whatever' is a claim that you are above such discussion. The same way that you are attempting to use it. To dismiss with contempt. I cant control the way you behave but I can control my response to create peace, the ultimate goal.
I am sure kelly Lliam holsworth and sarah rainford would both like to erase the memory of your miserable existence. You were married twice though.
‘In Kelly Lliam Holsworth v. Trevor Russell Holsworth, 2006 BCSC 604 (decided April 18, 2006), the Supreme Court of British Columbia determined the value of a ski expeditions company. The business was established during the marriage.’ Kelly is a real person yes?
‘We got married in cuba too’
‘Went down to the beach and said our vows. Beautiful sunset and Full Moon’
Sarah rainford was the bride yes?
Again lying and manipulating with a married once claim.
Peace is not your goal nor is it on the path to ‘whatever’ you hope to achieve.
Gaslighting with fallacy.the Trevor Holsworth way
I dont gaslight because what i type is true. If You are gaslit,
It is because you despise the truth.
No one refers to you as Trevor Holsworth. They refer to you as ‘Whatever Trevor’. Again because it is proven time and time again that you are full of shit.
I assume that you are a lawyer attempting to disparage me because of my evidence. It is very difficult for a citizen to work with an administration of justice that purports that Judges can ignore all my evidence including the official record of trial, the transcript and prefer fraud by a lawyer on a court order. What are your code of ethics? to protect the state, the court, other lawyers, yourself and fail to protect the clients interests completely. A complete failure of a lawyers code of ethics. A failure to protect the public and ensure that the administration is in compliance with the constitutional requirement to provide fair and impartial trials. You cannot have a complete lack of accountability and a guarantee of a citizens Charter of Rights. That is a contradiction in terms.
Very clear and the layout is accessible to the layperson trying to understand the Kafkaesque underworld of family law in Canada in the 21st century. Bravo 👌
That's what my ex-wife used to say...
I've only been married once. It meant she was in denial and didnt want her own accountability checked. If there was a difference of opinion it would be expressed with the possibility of one party changing their mind given evidence and argument. Using 'whatever' is a claim that you are above such discussion. The same way that you are attempting to use it. To dismiss with contempt. I cant control the way you behave but I can control my response to create peace, the ultimate goal.
I am sure kelly Lliam holsworth and sarah rainford would both like to erase the memory of your miserable existence. You were married twice though.
‘In Kelly Lliam Holsworth v. Trevor Russell Holsworth, 2006 BCSC 604 (decided April 18, 2006), the Supreme Court of British Columbia determined the value of a ski expeditions company. The business was established during the marriage.’ Kelly is a real person yes?
‘We got married in cuba too’
‘Went down to the beach and said our vows. Beautiful sunset and Full Moon’
Sarah rainford was the bride yes?
Again lying and manipulating with a married once claim.
Peace is not your goal nor is it on the path to ‘whatever’ you hope to achieve.
Gaslighting with fallacy.the Trevor Holsworth way
I dont gaslight because what i type is true. If You are gaslit,
It is because you despise the truth.
No one refers to you as Trevor Holsworth. They refer to you as ‘Whatever Trevor’. Again because it is proven time and time again that you are full of shit.
I was legally married once and a common law partner to the mother of my children. Thanks for exposing the truth. Why do you bother?
I assume that you are a lawyer attempting to disparage me because of my evidence. It is very difficult for a citizen to work with an administration of justice that purports that Judges can ignore all my evidence including the official record of trial, the transcript and prefer fraud by a lawyer on a court order. What are your code of ethics? to protect the state, the court, other lawyers, yourself and fail to protect the clients interests completely. A complete failure of a lawyers code of ethics. A failure to protect the public and ensure that the administration is in compliance with the constitutional requirement to provide fair and impartial trials. You cannot have a complete lack of accountability and a guarantee of a citizens Charter of Rights. That is a contradiction in terms.