Siezing the Ymir Backcountry Ski Lodge
Siezing the Ymir Backcountry Ski Lodge
Charter section 8 a "reasonable seizure" in a free and democratic State?
In the concluding chapter of a 20 years old story of exposing failures in the rule of law, corruption, trial fixing, judge shopping, fraud, constitutional violations and political cover-up is coming to a show-down.
The full detailed with evidence presentation is at www.fundamentaljustice.com
Details on the allegation of a Constitutional Crisis affecting the legitimacy of the administration of Government.
I will let the communications with the various officials and media tell this part of the story
I contacted my local MP who happens to be the BC Minister of Forests, Katrina Conroy
There is a lot of information to sift through on that site so I summarized the situation
and received this advice from her office.
The advice of the MP is to allow constitutional violations to occur and submit to our will and forget about abuse of power, it doesnt matter. But as she admits here, they do.
This was my initial comment to the Ministry of Forests. No reply to any of these questions has ever been answered, not through letters, enforcement procedure of the Charter, constitutional questions presented in court. Instead a complete denial and a claim that everything I say is “irrelevant”. The judiciary claim is that the public’s presentation of evidence of corruption within their system and their failure to resolve is just one of the risks that the Public must accept when they enter a court room. In summary I had evidence of lawyers committing fraud, law societies protecting them, judges protecting the lawyers by denial of the best evidence that any Canadian could provide, the transcript and ultimately constitutional failures by the Minister of Justice to ensure that the administration of justice is in compliance with the law and protecting the public which is his duty.
The communication continued without my satisfaction including this one to which he denied that there is any connection with my dispute with the Judiciary and the administration of Justice with his role as a public servant. Constitutional violations are not our problem, they are yours.
I have been polite, honest and clear in my communication with the government officials concerned. There has never been a defence produced to these allegations of corruption. They have been categorically denied without providing evidence to support. At the BC Court of Appeal they stated simply, “this does not reflect reality”. Clearly indicating that you have no rights to allege fraud or corruption in the Canadian Judiciary. A different perceptive to the Public’s regarding the legal maxim, “fraud and corruption are always the exception”
I think it would be in the public interest for the public to see the legal opinion that claims that public servants can breach the Charter and that exposure to fraud is acceptable in the Canadian legal system.
I concluded my communications,
I included all of this communication to the author of the article promptly and a receipt was confirmed.
Ultimately there are two things that are important to me.
That the administration of government should be in compliance with the law and the guarantee of fair and impartial trials and fundamental justice for the protection of the public must be maintained in a democracy
That the public not be denied access to this valuable public resource as a backcountry ski lodge which has operated here for the last twenty years.
As a side note several local backcountry lodges and our nearest neighbor, Whitewater Ski Resort received a million dollars in subsidies from the government post covid. I got nothing. They say politics is all about rewarding friends and punishing enemies. Thank you for reading part of my story.
Trevor Holsworth
Details on the allegation of a Constitutional Crisis affecting the legitimacy of the administration of Government.
www.fundamentaljustice.com
follow the story on twitter
If you are involved in this protest, we will actively look to identify you and follow up with financial sanctions and criminal charges, absolutely. This investigation will go on for months to come…it has many many different streams…”
Interim Police Chief Bell Feb 19th, 2022 Video
.
This post demonstrates the timing of my legal action with the invocation of the Emergencies Act.
https://ruleoflawcanada.substack.com/p/the-invocation-of-the-emergencies
A Constitutional Crisis in Canada that no-one is talking about, as it involves a documented failure of the legal system to protect the public and comply with the Constitution.
https://ruleoflawcanada.substack.com/p/constitutional-crisis-165
My submission to the Parliamentary Committee on Justice and Human Rights
https://ruleoflawcanada.substack.com/p/miscarriage-of-justice-reviews-bill
There is a lot more evidence out there at www.fundamentaljustice.com or following my substack.
The public deserves transparency and accountability in our legal system.
They cannot justify themselves in a free and democratic state. So they have not.
On Feb 14, 2022 Justice Lyster of the Nelson Supreme Court, appointed by Lametti, was supposed to provide a ruling on my request for a writ of mandamus on the minister of justice, an order for a minister to comply his duty - which in the case of the MOJ is to protect the public and ensure that the administration of justice was in compliance with the law. On Dec 4, 2021 I had presented a failure in the rule of law throughout the Canadian legal system, a failure of everyone involved to protect the public.
On Feb 14, 2022 The Minister of Justice invoked the Emergencies Act, which was subsequently found by Justice Mosely in the FC to have been invoked without justification, unconstitutionally, thus illegally.
Of course I feel that my rights are not being respected.
Of course I feel that improper motives are at play.