A Constitutional Crisis in Canada that no-one is talking about, as it involves a documented failure of the legal system to protect the public and comply with the Constitution.
On Feb 14, 2022 Justice Lyster of the Nelson Supreme Court, appointed by Lametti, was supposed to provide a ruling on my request for a writ of mandamus on the minister of justice, an order for a minister to comply his duty - which in the case of the MOJ is to protect the public and ensure that the administration of justice was in compliance with the law. On Dec 4, 2021 I had presented a failure in the rule of law throughout the Canadian legal system, a failure of everyone involved to protect the public.
On Feb 14, 2022 The Minister of Justice invoked the Emergencies Act, which was subsequently found by Justice Mosely in the FC to have been invoked without justification, unconstitutionally, thus illegally.
Of course I feel that my rights are not being respected.
Of course I feel that improper motives are at play.
So what is the reason they seized the lodge? You do not include the reasons? Your tenure expired and was not renewed. Correct? Ministry told me buildings and business violated tenure agreement. Are you still operating?
The Ministry claims that there is a breach of the tenure agreement. I claim that the government both provincial and federal AG's are in breach of the Charter as I served the enforcement procedure of the Charter s 24(1) as lawyers claim they dont have to comply with court orders and judges claim they can ignore the best evidence any Canadian could provide, the transcript. So there is no fair evidentiary method of resolving a dispute as they claim to be able to manipulate all evidence and not be bound by the rule of law. I am not operating and cannot operate under such an oppressive, unconstitutional and illegitimate regime. Nobody will invest in Canada under such a system. The Premier of BC is fully informed as is the PMO. Nobody is commenting. Fraud and Corruption is the accepted standard which is unacceptable. I am working with my local MLA Katrine Conroy but have not heard much in the last couple months.
Honestly it has everything to do with it. Who wants to work with a corrupt administration of government. If you cant trust a government to deal with you honestly then their opinion on what the breach is specifically is irrelevant. But, they wanted some upgrades to the building but given the abuse it ended up being impossible to comply and they wouldnt let me sell.
The non compliance or ‘breach’ of contract is relevant. It is the very basis of the non-renewal of the tenure agreement.
The tenure agreement was not renewed by MOF because of multiple contract violations. There was no corruption in the MOF administration pertaining to the handling of your file. MOF did not manipulate evidence. The MOF was NOT directed by MOJ or any other branch of government regarding your previous tenure. You have been told this a dozen times. The lodge was illegally built on leased land. You have no ownership of any building on that land because the lodge and its operation was not permitted in your lease agreement.
Therefore ‘they would not let me sell’ is a dishonest manipulation of facts. MOF would not respond to your request for a sale because that is an ignorant and insane request.
I agree that the non compliance or 'breach' of the contract between citizens and the State is relevant. The Charter is the governing document which guarantees fundamental rights and Canada is not in compliance. A breach in the Constitution requires a restoration of that breach. The government must be in compliance with the law before they have legitimate authority to enforce the law.
I'll not be responding to your abusive comments further. You seem to be arguing that the government doesnt have to comply with the law and only the citizens do. Good luck with that. That is called a dictatorship and I'll not operate under that abuse. Nobody should. You already admitted that when you agreed that I had suffered injustice. The Judiciary is the head of the Public Service. It does not matter if the individual department of the MOF did or did not have direction from above.
How would YOU function if you could not protect your interests or assert your rights under ANY circumstance no matter what the evidence. Walk a mile in my shoes.
No where in the comments does it state they agree with you that you suffered an injustice.
There is no argument (other than your arguments) in the comments that says the government does not have to comply with the law and only the citizens do.
It does matter if an individual department of the MOF did have direction from above. That is your claim.‘MOJ seized my last remaining asset.’ Thats a load of bullshit and you know it.
Your deflections and hypocrisy proves you are a fraud. The hasty generalization fallacies of all authorities prove you are a grifter.
This post demonstrates the timing of my legal action with the invocation of the Emergencies Act.
https://ruleoflawcanada.substack.com/p/the-invocation-of-the-emergencies
A Constitutional Crisis in Canada that no-one is talking about, as it involves a documented failure of the legal system to protect the public and comply with the Constitution.
https://ruleoflawcanada.substack.com/p/constitutional-crisis-165
My submission to the Parliamentary Committee on Justice and Human Rights
https://ruleoflawcanada.substack.com/p/miscarriage-of-justice-reviews-bill
There is a lot more evidence out there at www.fundamentaljustice.com or following my substack.
The public deserves transparency and accountability in our legal system.
They cannot justify themselves in a free and democratic state. So they have not.
On Feb 14, 2022 Justice Lyster of the Nelson Supreme Court, appointed by Lametti, was supposed to provide a ruling on my request for a writ of mandamus on the minister of justice, an order for a minister to comply his duty - which in the case of the MOJ is to protect the public and ensure that the administration of justice was in compliance with the law. On Dec 4, 2021 I had presented a failure in the rule of law throughout the Canadian legal system, a failure of everyone involved to protect the public.
On Feb 14, 2022 The Minister of Justice invoked the Emergencies Act, which was subsequently found by Justice Mosely in the FC to have been invoked without justification, unconstitutionally, thus illegally.
Of course I feel that my rights are not being respected.
Of course I feel that improper motives are at play.
So what is the reason they seized the lodge? You do not include the reasons? Your tenure expired and was not renewed. Correct? Ministry told me buildings and business violated tenure agreement. Are you still operating?
The Ministry claims that there is a breach of the tenure agreement. I claim that the government both provincial and federal AG's are in breach of the Charter as I served the enforcement procedure of the Charter s 24(1) as lawyers claim they dont have to comply with court orders and judges claim they can ignore the best evidence any Canadian could provide, the transcript. So there is no fair evidentiary method of resolving a dispute as they claim to be able to manipulate all evidence and not be bound by the rule of law. I am not operating and cannot operate under such an oppressive, unconstitutional and illegitimate regime. Nobody will invest in Canada under such a system. The Premier of BC is fully informed as is the PMO. Nobody is commenting. Fraud and Corruption is the accepted standard which is unacceptable. I am working with my local MLA Katrine Conroy but have not heard much in the last couple months.
Your quest for justice has nothing to do with your failure to renew the tenure agreement.
Honestly, What was the breach of the tenure specifically ? Surely the ministry told you.
Honestly it has everything to do with it. Who wants to work with a corrupt administration of government. If you cant trust a government to deal with you honestly then their opinion on what the breach is specifically is irrelevant. But, they wanted some upgrades to the building but given the abuse it ended up being impossible to comply and they wouldnt let me sell.
The non compliance or ‘breach’ of contract is relevant. It is the very basis of the non-renewal of the tenure agreement.
The tenure agreement was not renewed by MOF because of multiple contract violations. There was no corruption in the MOF administration pertaining to the handling of your file. MOF did not manipulate evidence. The MOF was NOT directed by MOJ or any other branch of government regarding your previous tenure. You have been told this a dozen times. The lodge was illegally built on leased land. You have no ownership of any building on that land because the lodge and its operation was not permitted in your lease agreement.
Therefore ‘they would not let me sell’ is a dishonest manipulation of facts. MOF would not respond to your request for a sale because that is an ignorant and insane request.
I agree that the non compliance or 'breach' of the contract between citizens and the State is relevant. The Charter is the governing document which guarantees fundamental rights and Canada is not in compliance. A breach in the Constitution requires a restoration of that breach. The government must be in compliance with the law before they have legitimate authority to enforce the law.
I'll not be responding to your abusive comments further. You seem to be arguing that the government doesnt have to comply with the law and only the citizens do. Good luck with that. That is called a dictatorship and I'll not operate under that abuse. Nobody should. You already admitted that when you agreed that I had suffered injustice. The Judiciary is the head of the Public Service. It does not matter if the individual department of the MOF did or did not have direction from above.
How would YOU function if you could not protect your interests or assert your rights under ANY circumstance no matter what the evidence. Walk a mile in my shoes.
No where in the comments does it state they agree with you that you suffered an injustice.
There is no argument (other than your arguments) in the comments that says the government does not have to comply with the law and only the citizens do.
It does matter if an individual department of the MOF did have direction from above. That is your claim.‘MOJ seized my last remaining asset.’ Thats a load of bullshit and you know it.
Your deflections and hypocrisy proves you are a fraud. The hasty generalization fallacies of all authorities prove you are a grifter.