My summary of the events leading to the invocation of the Emergencies Act including my perspective which has never been publicly reported except through isolated tweets.
Why dont you publish your real name instead of hiding. You are correct that the BC Court of Appeal labelled me a conspiracy theorist and my claims as not reflecting reality although they did have in their hands evidence from the Canadian Judicial Council claiming that Judges have discretion to protect a lawyer committing fraud on a court order by rejecting my evidence, the official record of trial, the transcript.
And when I attempted to question the CRA Agent at trial regarding his opinion on the fairness of a trial conducted under these circumstances the Judge refused to allow him to answer.
And that the Public Prosecution Service of Canada dropped their prosecution of me on failing to file income tax statements, (my initial protest against an abusive and unconstitutional administration) "in the public interest" after an examination of prosecutorial discretion and another matter is currently held up at the BC Court of Appeal waiting for the Nelson Registry to comply with a court order to provide the court audio which discloses the corruption. It's been over a year now. I doubt they will ever comply.
And given that the Judge who sentenced me declared that there were no miscarriages of justice despite evidence of fraud and judicial corruption protecting the fraud but when the Judiciary can ignore all the evidence that any Canadian could provide then such miscarriages of justice will be guaranteed to occur.
But they are trying to shut me up because legally the courts are conducting themselves unconstitutionally and refusing to allow their discretion to be examined by the only court of competent jurisdiction to do so, which is Parliament. It is obvious to anyone that the Judiciary is in conflict with their constitutional requirement to provide a "fair and impartial trial" and so legally their decisions are of "no force or effect" until they rectify the situation. They are obviously biased towards lawyers as they will reject the best evidence any canadian could provide to protect fraud committed by a lawyer which is obviously unfair.
Who do you work for? Are you a lawyer, or an otherwise biased Party? Why would anyone defend such conduct and project their guilt onto another...
The crown has an obligation to be in compliance with the Constitution. That has to be proven first. I have made an allegation of failures to comply with the Charter. They have refused to justify themselves as required in a free and democratic state s1. because there is no justification possible for lawyers committing fraud and not being disciplined and judges ignoring all the evidence that I can provide. Until these problems are resolved the underlying conditions are irrelevant as is the court system for all Canadians. The BC AG and present Premier of BC has been fully informed of the problems including a registered letter which he has refused to respond to. The Charter is a guarantee. I dont have to prove anything until that guarantee is resolved, as you know. It's impossible for me to prove anything in a court which claims discretion to ignore everything including the transcript, and continue to do so. No Canadian accepts that as acceptable conduct for a judge, or a lawyer.
Your ‘evidence’ is never related to the issue at hand.
Your claims without evidence does not make them true.
Arif Virani did not instruct MOF to terminate your land tenure. You terminated the agreement by breaching it a dozens times over.
Its quite a tangled web woven by a liar who needs to lie to cover up the previous lie to hide his finances to cover up another lie to manipulate your finances to avoid paying child support. Must be exhausting to hold onto the falsehoods
‘They tried to run me off the road’ commenting on RCMP
‘They tried to kill me on the way home from prison’
Why dont you publish your real name instead of hiding. You are correct that the BC Court of Appeal labelled me a conspiracy theorist and my claims as not reflecting reality although they did have in their hands evidence from the Canadian Judicial Council claiming that Judges have discretion to protect a lawyer committing fraud on a court order by rejecting my evidence, the official record of trial, the transcript.
And when I attempted to question the CRA Agent at trial regarding his opinion on the fairness of a trial conducted under these circumstances the Judge refused to allow him to answer.
And that the Public Prosecution Service of Canada dropped their prosecution of me on failing to file income tax statements, (my initial protest against an abusive and unconstitutional administration) "in the public interest" after an examination of prosecutorial discretion and another matter is currently held up at the BC Court of Appeal waiting for the Nelson Registry to comply with a court order to provide the court audio which discloses the corruption. It's been over a year now. I doubt they will ever comply.
And given that the Judge who sentenced me declared that there were no miscarriages of justice despite evidence of fraud and judicial corruption protecting the fraud but when the Judiciary can ignore all the evidence that any Canadian could provide then such miscarriages of justice will be guaranteed to occur.
But they are trying to shut me up because legally the courts are conducting themselves unconstitutionally and refusing to allow their discretion to be examined by the only court of competent jurisdiction to do so, which is Parliament. It is obvious to anyone that the Judiciary is in conflict with their constitutional requirement to provide a "fair and impartial trial" and so legally their decisions are of "no force or effect" until they rectify the situation. They are obviously biased towards lawyers as they will reject the best evidence any canadian could provide to protect fraud committed by a lawyer which is obviously unfair.
Who do you work for? Are you a lawyer, or an otherwise biased Party? Why would anyone defend such conduct and project their guilt onto another...
You like to provide evidence. Provide the communications where the MOF clearly explains your crown land tenure agreement violations.
You claim your fight with the courts and bc and federal governments had retaliatory actions cancelling your crown land tenure. Prove it.
The crown has an obligation to be in compliance with the Constitution. That has to be proven first. I have made an allegation of failures to comply with the Charter. They have refused to justify themselves as required in a free and democratic state s1. because there is no justification possible for lawyers committing fraud and not being disciplined and judges ignoring all the evidence that I can provide. Until these problems are resolved the underlying conditions are irrelevant as is the court system for all Canadians. The BC AG and present Premier of BC has been fully informed of the problems including a registered letter which he has refused to respond to. The Charter is a guarantee. I dont have to prove anything until that guarantee is resolved, as you know. It's impossible for me to prove anything in a court which claims discretion to ignore everything including the transcript, and continue to do so. No Canadian accepts that as acceptable conduct for a judge, or a lawyer.
Your ‘evidence’ is never related to the issue at hand.
Your claims without evidence does not make them true.
Arif Virani did not instruct MOF to terminate your land tenure. You terminated the agreement by breaching it a dozens times over.
Its quite a tangled web woven by a liar who needs to lie to cover up the previous lie to hide his finances to cover up another lie to manipulate your finances to avoid paying child support. Must be exhausting to hold onto the falsehoods
‘They tried to run me off the road’ commenting on RCMP
‘They tried to kill me on the way home from prison’
commenting on DOC
Trevor Holsworth is a very disturbed little man